Challenges:
- Allegations of Cyber Fraud
- Mass Arrests & Procedural Issues
- Lack of Direct Evidence
- Supreme Court Guidelines Ignored
- 95688 08835
- 70170 92986
- tssindiaandassociates@gmail.com
The case revolved around allegations of cyber fraud, wherein multiple accused individuals were booked under sections 419/420/120B/34 IPC along with Sections 66C and 66D of the IT Act. The prosecution claimed that the accused were involved in operating a call center that allegedly defrauded US citizens. However, the defense highlighted critical legal lapses in the investigation and arbitrary arrests made by law enforcement agencies.
After careful consideration of the arguments, the court ruled in favor of granting bail to the accused. The court stated:
“Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, applicants are admitted to bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of each with one surety each of like amount to the satisfaction of Ld. MM/Link MM/duty MM concerned.”
Furthermore, the court acknowledged the failure of law enforcement authorities in adhering to Supreme Court guidelines and directed the police to ensure compliance in future cases.