Challenges:
- Failure to Establish Rash and Negligent Driving
- Unclear Role of the Offending Vehicle
- Contradictions in Evidence
- Legal Standard of Proof Not Met
- 95688 08835
- 70170 92986
- tssindiaandassociates@gmail.com
Rahul, the appellant, was convicted by the ACMM, South West District, Dwarka Courts, for offenses under Sections 283 and 304A IPC in FIR No. 29/2021. The conviction stemmed from a road accident on 24.01.2021, where a dumper allegedly driven by Rahul was parked on a public way without indicators, leading to a motorcyclist, Kuldeep Singh, colliding with it and succumbing to injuries.
The Trial Court sentenced Rahul to six months of simple imprisonment under Section 304A IPC and imposed a fine of ₹200 under Section 283 IPC. The conviction was based on witness testimony, including that of PW-4 Aman, who was present at the scene but did not witness the actual accident.
This Court is of the considered opinion that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove its case against the appellant. Therefore, the judgment dated 15.04.2024 and order on sentence dated 22.07.2024 are set aside. Appellant is acquitted for the offence U/s 283/304-A IPC. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
This judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of strong evidence and reliable witness testimony in securing a conviction. The case was ultimately decided in favor of the appellant due to lack of sufficient proof from the prosecution.